HELP ASAP 15 points! The political communication below was created in 1960 by the American Federation of Labor.

Political communication with a photo of Jack Kennedy (John F. Kennedy) on the top and Richard Nixon on the bottom. The text reads 'a look at the record – From labor's viewpoint, on key votes, Jack Kennedy has voted right 120 times, and wrong 2 times. Richard Nixon has voted right 10 times, and wrong 59 times'
©Universal History Archive/Universal Images Group/ImageQuest 2019

Which statement best describes this political communication?

It is free of political bias.
It does not use symbolism.
It is an example of propaganda.
It promotes Richard Nixon.

I would either say it does not use symbolism or it is an example of propaganda.

Explanation:

C, It is an example of propoganda.

Explanation: Obviously not D, it helps Kennedy. not A, since this does have some opinions in it. It indeed does use symbolism. Yes, this is propaganda!

Enjoy!

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.  

answer; triadic reciprocal determinism;