subject

In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the state of Georgia wanted to remove Cherokees from within its borders and began to annex Cherokee land. How did the Court rule? A.
Only the federal government had the authority to deal with the Cherokees and the Georgia laws dealing with them were unconstitutional.
B.
The Georgia laws in the case were upheld as constitutional.
C.
The federal government and the state of Georgia both had the authority to deal with the Cherokees.
D.
The state of Georgia did not have the authority to deal with the Cherokees; the true authority belonged to the state of Alabama.

Please select the best answer from the choices provided

A
B
C
D

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:00
Restricting immigrants from entering a country may be based on what belief?  
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 12:50
Because of the amount of precipitation it receives, most of populated australia can be considered a) alpine. b) piedmont. c) semi-arid. d) tropical rainforest.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 13:30
What idea from enlightenment influenced the founding fathers when writing the declaration of independence?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 17:00
Why were the articles of confederation replaced with the constitution? a. the articles of confederation did not vice strong power to the federal government. b. the articles of confederation did not create a government structure for the states. c. the articles of confederation did not provide powers for strong individual state governments. d. the articles of confederation did not allow the federal government to deal with foreign countries.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the state of Georgia wanted to remove Cherokees from within its bord...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.04.2021 17:40
question
Mathematics, 21.04.2021 17:40
Questions on the website: 13722367