PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST 20 + POINTS What do you think about suppressing certain evidence because it has been
obtained illegally? How does it relate to the Constitutional right to due process?
Explain your point of view fully, giving examples to back yourself up.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Explanation:

If it was obtained illegally then evidence should not be used like if they threaten to kill it should not be used. It relates because while due process  no incrimination.

Explanation:

explanation:

allergens: overstimulate the nerve system

neurotics: attack nerve cells

mutagens: damage or otherwise alter dna sequence

generators: cause defects during growth and development  

carcinogens: cause unchecked cell growth

i hope you get the idea according to me these are the effects that happened.

i think it is the third one.