1. Describe what is happening in the state of Montana in terms of the influence of dark money. 2. Describe what is happening in the state of Wisconsin in terms of the influence of dark money.
3. What is the Federal Election Commission? What is their function and purpose? Do they perform their job well?
4. How has dark money influenced state courts? 5. How has the Supreme Court's decisions affected the flow of dark money?
6. What difficulties have investigative journalist experienced while covering stories of dark money? Please explain.
7. What interested/surprised you most about the documentary? Please explain.
8. How does such a political system influenced by vast amounts of dark money help and/or hinder Politics in the United States? Please explain.

Which of the following statements about slavery is not correct? a. slavery was a very profitable industry that build the united states. b. the french were the first to profit from the african slave trade. c. slaves were sold at auction blocks like farm animals. d. slaves were not considered citizens or even people.

Endogamy is marriage within one’s own social category. select the best answer from the choices provided true or false

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?