Sixteen-year-old Chandra questions her parents' values but does not fully accept her friends' standards either. Her confusion about what she really wants and values in life suggests that Chandra is struggling with the problem of



Identity

Explanation:

There are several reasons for the problem of Personal Identity. It is highly impossible that an individual should remains expressly the same throughout their life time mainly in skin ages, change our thoughts and others. A change that is constant is a part of our existence. The 3 Views on Personal Identity includes;

1. Illusion Theory

2. The Self as Substance (Body & Soul)

3. The Self as Psychic Continuity (Memory Theory)

An Identity simply shows who an individual is, what you value, your direction in life, commitments to vocation, relationships, sexual orientation, ethnic group, ideals and others. The problem and confusion with identity is due lack direction and definition of self, restricted movement in adolescence and early psychosocial conflicts not resolved; society resists choices and lastly not being ready for adulthood.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

answer; /// the above statement is (false);