subject
Social Studies, 15.12.2020 23:20 49Janett

Read the passage from the Bhagavad Gita. There is "right" Action: that which . . . Is wrought without attachment, passionlessly, For duty, not for love, nor hate, nor gain. There is "vain" Action: that which men pursue Aching to satisfy desires, impelled By sense of self, with all-absorbing stress: This is . . . passionate and vain. There is "dark" Action: when one doth a thing Heedless of issues, heedless of the hurt Or wrong for others, heedless if he harm –Bhagavad Gita How does this passage present information? sequentially descriptively comparatively with cause and effect

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30
Brainliest to who answers! what is the function of a purchasing cooperative, or co-op?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
What if the united states, mexico, and canada took the eu’s example and joined to forms north american union ? based on your knowledge of the europe union, describe two setbacks or hurdles that this idea might face
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:30
Calculate the iq of a 20 year old who has the mental age of 25
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Read the passage from the Bhagavad Gita. There is "right" Action: that which . . . Is wrought withou...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 01.12.2020 01:10
Questions on the website: 13722365