What is the best description of the role of women in Athens? Women were allowed to own property, but they could not vote. Women were considered full citizens even though they could not vote. Women were confined to taking care of the home and their children. Women were lumped in with enslaved persons and free men in their roles.

Women were confined to taking care of the home and their children.

Explanation:

Athenian women have been in a subordinate position for much of the history of that Greek polis. Most women spent time at home taking care of the children and cooking. During this period, the term "white dungeon" was coined, alluding to a woman in an Athenian home. The men spent most of their time outside, even consuming many meals outside, so their home was mostly used for lodging. Women were free but did not have the right to vote; they were in a slightly better social position than slaves. Unlike the Athenians, Spartan women had a much better and more comfortable position in society.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: