The jury at a state court in North Carolina convicted Diane for driving under influence. However, she wasn’t satisfied with this verdict. She decided to invoke her [ Select ] right to [ Select ] in the hope that a higher court would change the decision in her favor. First drop down answers
A- Fifth amendment
B- Second amendment
C- Seventh amendment
Second drop down answers
A- vote
B- appeal
C- revolt

First is 7th amendment 2nd is appeal.

Explanation:

got it right

Complete the following passage by filling in the blanks.

The jury at a state court in North Carolina convicted Diane for driving under influence. However, she wasn’t satisfied with this verdict. She decided to invoke her

Second Amendment

right to

appeal

in the hope that a higher court would change the decision in her favor.

what are the options?

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.