Social Studies, 17.09.2019 08:50 QueenFlowerCrown98

Why do many americans believe that rights should be clearly stated and identified?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: mayamabjishovrvq9

So that the people are clear on what they can and cant do and what the government thinks is correct or not correct.

Explanation:

Americans believe that Rights should be clearly stated because of following reasons:

when the authorities or governments try to use oppressive, coercive or impulsive action against citizen's rights.

They can raise their voice on behalf of stated and written laws and rights against the Injudicious and impulsive behaviors of authorities.

and stated rights could protect the citizen's rights.

The government should mention all the rights of the citizens because the main objective of the government and authorities to protect the rights and development of the citizens.

Answer from: Quest

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

me no say

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30

How was the appointment of two consuls during the roman republic an example of a democratic principle? one consul represented patricians and one represented plebeians, so that all citizens had representation each consul had control over the same number of military legions, which prevented either one from a forceful takeover. consuls had to agree on all decisions, which prevented any one person from gaining too much power. consuls had to make decisions based on majority rule in the senate. quickly

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:00

following the agreement that was reached in the treaty of indian springs in 1825, chief william mcintosh lost his life. why did this happen

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:30

The second westward surge reached the: mississippi river, appalachian mountains, oregon territory

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:20

Voters commonly condemn politicians for being insincere, but politicians often must disguise their true feelings when they make public statements. if they expressed their honest views—about, say, their party's policies—then achieving politically necessary compromises would be much more difficult. clearly, the very insincerity that people decry shows that our government is functioning well. which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines this reasoning? (a) achieving political compromises is not all that is necessary for the proper functioning of a government. (b) some political compromises are not in the best long-term interest of the government. (c) voters often judge politicians by criteria other than the sincerity with which they express their views. (d) a political party's policies could turn out to be detrimental to the functioning of a government. (e) some of the public statements made by politicians about their party's policies could in fact be sincere.