subject
Social Studies, 21.11.2020 07:40 joedawg50

will mark brainliest! If the 50 kg object slows down to a velocity of 1 m/s, how much
kinetic energy does it have?
a 100 J
b 50 J
C 25 J
d none of the above

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30
What was the result of president taft's "dollar diplomacy
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30
8. select a supreme court case that has been particularly important in protecting civil liberties in the united states. in a three-paragraph essay, describe the case and the ruling, then explain how the case demonstrates why it is important that the supreme court is: a. protected from political or public pressure (since justices are appointed rather than elected and serve lifetime terms) b. able to change its interpretations of the law over time (10 points)
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:31
What choices did the family of emmett till and their supporters make in exposing the brutality of his murder? how did these choices shape public reaction to the murder?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
will mark brainliest! If the 50 kg object slows down to a velocity of 1 m/s, how much
kinetic...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722363