Does the Necessary and proper clause quoted in this excerpt comfort or upset the author? Why?

1. The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.

2. Upset: it makes the Congress even more powerful than it’s previous long list of expressed powers

3. A Bill of Rights is necessary to protect the rights of citizens. The proposed Constitution does not do enough.  

4. Yes he does, and it matters because if you don’t trust the people in power you wouldn’t have a real nation.

5.He seems more like an Anti-Federalist.

Part Two

1. Unnecessary and dangerous

2. From the Federalist No.84

3. No because he believes that its unnecessary and not needed in the constitution.

4. That the bill of rights is pointless and not realistic for the American people.

5 He is defiantly Anti-Federalist; He goes against everything Federalism is for.

1. artillery

2. jose san martin

3.their economies remained dependent on outside powers.

4. drafted new economies

5. democracies have replaced dictatorships

sir frederic attributed inaccuracies to schemas. memory reconstruction is one part actual events and one part personal schema, which can result in inaccuracies when memories are reconstructed.