What is a correct assumption historians make when they evaluate a source of information? They know an eyewitness report will be free of bias.
They know an eyewitness report will always be accurate.
They know an expert will provide the most accurate information.
They know a student who did research will be the most accurate source.

They know an expert will provide the most accurate information.

i think the answer is true : ))

giant impact theory - the moon was formed from the collision between earth and another mars-sized body.

colliding planetesimals hypothesis - the moon was formed from the same cloud of material as earth.

capture hypothesis - the moon was locked into orbit by earths gravity as it was passing by it.

accretion hypothesis - the moon was formed from collisions and combining of planetesimals.

i think this is right, if not and you know better let me know.