20 POINTS The Call of the Wild is told in 3rd Person Omniscient Point of View: Even though Buck is the focus of the story, we are able to see the thoughts and actions of other characters in the novel. The narrator uses the third person pronouns, 'he', 'she' and 'they.

Imagine if the story was told from a different point of view.

Writing Prompt: Using first person point of view, write a short imagined scene from the viewpoint of one of the other dogs in the novel as he or she meets Buck for the first time. Your scene should be at least 150-200 words.

Quick 1st Person Point of View Review: First person point of view uses the pronoun ‘I’. The story is told through the eyes of one character. Examples: “I hopped on the sled and I led the team” and “I met Buck on the coldest night of the year”.

The Call of the Wild" by Jack London tells the story of Buck, a mixed-breed dog that starts his life as a pet but transforms into a wild animal. A third-person, limited omniscient narrator tells the story of Buck's struggles to overcome his breeding and upbringing to become the leader of a wolf pack in the wild.

The Limited-Omniscient Technique

The third-person, limited-omniscient narrator knows all there is to know about a single character, and relates that character's thoughts, feelings and actions. The narrator does not include the thoughts or emotions of other characters, and only provides the actions of other characters when the main character is present or learns of them second-hand. In "The Call of the Wild," London focuses solely on the character of Buck. He explains the world of the story only through Buck's canine perspective and experience.

Explanation:

I HOPE THAT WHAT YOU MEAN

hello

Explanation:

answer; /// (a) and (b) ; /// but i believe the correct answer is ; /apart from fines and jail time, driving under the influence puts the life of the driver and everyone else on the road at risk; (b)

freeborn women in ancient rome were citizens (cives), but could not vote or hold political office. because of their limited public role, women are named less frequently than men by roman historians. but while roman women held no direct political power, those from wealthy or powerful families could and did exert influence through private negotiations. exceptional women who left an undeniable mark on history range from lucretia and claudia quinta, whose stories took on mythic significance; fierce republican-era women such as cornelia, mother of the gracchi, and fulvia, who commanded an army and issued coins bearing her image; women of the julio-claudian dynasty, most prominently livia (58 bc-ad 29), who contributed to the formation of imperial mores; and the empress helena (c.250–330 ad), a driving force in promoting christianity.

women in the ancient greek world had few rights in comparison to male citizens. unable to vote, own land, or inherit, a woman’s place was in the home and her purpose in life was the rearing of children. this, though, is a general description, and when considering the role of women in ancient greece one should remember that information regarding specific city-states is often lacking, is almost always from male authors, and only in athens can their status and role be described in any great detail. neither are we sure of the practical and everyday application of the rules and laws that have survived from antiquity. we do know that spartan women were treated somewhat differently than in other states. for example, they had to do physical training like men, were permitted to own land, and could drink wine.