subject
Social Studies, 10.11.2020 16:00 becca2327

1954: In Hernandez v. Texas, the Supreme Court rules that trying a defendant before a jury that deliberately excludes members of the
defendant's ethnic group violates the equal protection clause.
1960: In Boynton v. Virginia, the Supreme Court rules that arresting an
African American passenger for using a "whites-only" bus station
violates the Interstate Commerce Act, which forbids discrimination in
interstate transportation.
2015: In Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court rules that state laws
forbidding same-sex marriage violate the equal protection clause.
What do the events in this timeline suggest about how the Supreme Court
has protected the civil rights of minority groups?
O A. It has limited civil rights using only the Fourteenth Amendment.
OB. It has protected the civil rights of racial minorities but not others.
O c. It has protected civil rights using the Fourteenth Amendment and
other laws.
OD. It has based its protections on the First Amendment.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:30
How are decisions by the supreme court under chief justice john marshall strengthened federal power
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:00
What does the creature say is the reason for his bloodthirsty, fiendish behavior?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:40
The defendant is charged with the battery of a bouncer at a local tavern. at the trial, the prosecutor introduces evidence that while the bouncer was attempting to question the defendant about her intoxicated demeanor, the defendant committed a battery on the bouncer. the defendant attempts to defend against the charge on the basis of self-defense, insisting that the bouncer used excessive force in stopping her from entering the tavern. the defendant attempts to introduce into evidence an authenticated copy of the tavern records that show that three patrons had written complaints against the bouncer within the past six months for the use of excessive force. the prosecutor objects on the grounds that the records are inadmissible character evidence. should the court sustain the objection?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30
Donald was arrested for murdering an acquaintance. at the trial, donald takes the stand and testifies that he and the victim knew each other. he admits that they would drink and use drugs together. one night while partying, donald explains in his testimony, an argument got out of hand during a card game. donald explains that the victim accused him of cheating and pulled out a knife on him and started swinging it in the air. donald said that he had no choice but to pull out his gun and shoot the victim. the jury convicted donald of manslaughter. who would argue that donald weighed the potential costs and benefits of shooting the victim and decided to pull the trigger as a result of free will? a. a rational choice theorist b. a critical criminologist c. a conflict theorist d. a positivist
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
1954: In Hernandez v. Texas, the Supreme Court rules that trying a defendant before a jury that del...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.08.2019 08:10
question
Physics, 05.08.2019 08:10
question
Mathematics, 05.08.2019 09:10
Questions on the website: 13722363