subject
Social Studies, 06.11.2020 20:20 jadynnnnn1795

PLZ HELP ME In which of the following situations could you compare and contrast?
A
You are voting for class president, and there are three students running.

B
You are writing an essay about which time period youтАЩd rather live in: the 1980s or the 1880s.

C
You are deciding what the major differences are between the first and last Harry Potter books.

D
All of the above

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 18:50
Acar traveling at 65 mile per hour has kinetic energy because of its position on the road. true or false
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00
How did world war i contribute to the events leading up to world war ii? (a)germans wanted to expand their nation to regain territory in the soviet union. (b)britain and france wanted to force germany to make reparation payments. (c)germans hated the versailles treaty and supported hitler's actions to defy it. (d)the soviet union wanted to take over german territory in eastern europe.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:50
Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
PLZ HELP ME In which of the following situations could you compare and contrast?
A
You ar...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 28.06.2021 23:30
question
Mathematics, 28.06.2021 23:30
question
Business, 28.06.2021 23:30
question
Mathematics, 28.06.2021 23:30
Questions on the website: 13722367