subject
Social Studies, 05.11.2020 05:40 reed361

Anybody wanna chat, Joke, Rp?
Im so bored rn.


Anybody wanna chat, Joke, Rp?
Im so bored rn.
Anybody wanna chat, Joke, Rp?
Im so bored rn.
Anybody wanna chat, Joke, Rp?
Im so bored rn.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:50
Astudy that involves interviews of adults is eligible for expedited review. the researcher wants to add an adolescent population (aged 12 to 17) to the study and has designed a parental permission and assent process. no additional changes are planned. which of the following statements about review of the revised protocol is accurate? the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents are capable of understanding the same consent forms used for the adult population.the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents have been declared to be emancipated minors.the new research would need full review by a convened irb because children are a protected population.unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to > minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:30
The structure of the federal bureaucracy is well-known as being large and complex. which of the following is not part of the federal bureaucracy?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 10:50
Does anyone know the answers to the australia and the pacific test? here is one of the questions: "which is the correct order of events related to the history of australia and new zealand? place the earliest event at the top and the last event at the bottom." 1. australia and new zealand become dominions. 2. world war 1 occurs. 3. australia and new zealand become independent countries. 4. british recognizes australia and new zealand as equals to britain under the british crown. , i need the correct order down below. i need to submit fast and do not waste my time.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 14:30
Horton automatics and the industrial division of the communications workers of america, the union that represented horton’s workers, negotiated a collective bargaining agreement. if an employee’s discharge for a workplace-rule violation was submitted to arbitration, the agreement limited the arbitrator to determining whether the rule was reasonable and whether the employee had violated it. when horton discharged employee ruben de la garza, the union appealed to arbitration. the arbitrator found that de la garza had violated a reasonable safety rule, but “was not totally convinced” that horton should have treated the violation more seriously than other rule violations. the arbitrator ordered de la garza reinstated. can a court set aside this order
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Anybody wanna chat, Joke, Rp?
Im so bored rn.


...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.05.2021 18:00
question
Arts, 25.05.2021 18:00
question
History, 25.05.2021 18:00
question
Spanish, 25.05.2021 18:00
Questions on the website: 13722360