1. Write a summary of the case. 2. Explain why this case is related to the constitution.

3. Did the decision in this case expand or protect individual rights. Explain.

Please help me with this

If you heat soup on a stove, what happens to the movement of the soup's particles? a. the particles move slower. b. the particles move faster. c. there's no change in the speed of particles. d. the particles stop moving.

“a monarchy is indeed the most powerful of any… but then there is imminent danger of his employing that strength to improvident or oppressive purposes.”—william blackstone, commentaries on the laws of england which of the following documents addressed blackstone’s concern in this quote? the magna carta, because it limited the power of the king. common sense, because it encouraged american colonists to declare independence. the mayflower compact, because it created a government and the first written laws for plymouth settlers. the english bill of rights, because it later influenced the u.s. bill of rights.

What can you conclude about the information given here ? a)juveniles must testify in court b)adults are held to a lower standard c)the state guarantees that juveniles have legal rights much like those of adults d) punishment for juveniles violators are much more strict than those for adults