subject
Social Studies, 21.10.2020 08:01 lexilove262

What is missing from the Bill of Rights? What rights deserve protection or what limits on authority could be usefully added to protect Americans today?
Compose a proposed new Amendment to add to the Constitution.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 19:40
Asappp which of the following is not a requirement for an adult to become a u.s. citizen? have been born on u.s. soil pass a u.s. history and government test be a legal, permanent u.s. resident swear loyalty to the united states
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:20
How can a person be self justified he or she is proceeding in legal ways
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30
Music the height of a wave or the amount of the wave carries is the amplitude. a.air b.nodes c.speed d.energy
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
What is missing from the Bill of Rights? What rights deserve protection or what limits on authority...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.07.2019 08:00
question
World Languages, 20.07.2019 08:00
question
Mathematics, 20.07.2019 08:00
Questions on the website: 13722363