Social Studies, 20.10.2020 05:01 taylordalton93

Please help im broke and sleep oj]n the flloororr r

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00

Three thieves agreed to rob a bank. the first was to steal a car to be used for the getaway, the second agreed to procure weapons, and the third would check the bank for cameras. the car thief stole a car and parked it in a lot behind his girlfriend's apartment building. while visiting her the night before the robbery, the car thief suffered a series of convulsive seizures. he was rushed to the hospital where he was placed in the intensive care unit and heavily sedated. meanwhile the two other thieves, unaware of their accomplice's illness, met and decided to rob the bank on their own, despite the absence of a getaway car and driver. they robbed the bank, but were quickly apprehended as they tried to escape and implicated the car thief under police questioning.the car thief can be charged with: a theft of the car only.b conspiracy to commit robbery and theft of the car only.c robbery and theft of the car only.d theft of the car, conspiracy to commit robbery, and robbery.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 14:30

Horton automatics and the industrial division of the communications workers of america, the union that represented hortonâ€™s workers, negotiated a collective bargaining agreement. if an employeeâ€™s discharge for a workplace-rule violation was submitted to arbitration, the agreement limited the arbitrator to determining whether the rule was reasonable and whether the employee had violated it. when horton discharged employee ruben de la garza, the union appealed to arbitration. the arbitrator found that de la garza had violated a reasonable safety rule, but â€śwas not totally convincedâ€ť that horton should have treated the violation more seriously than other rule violations. the arbitrator ordered de la garza reinstated. can a court set aside this order

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 18:20

Afederally funded research study involving children 8 to 12 years old involves collecting a single voided urine sample to assess the frequency of asymptomatic proteinuria (higher amounts of protein in the urine without any signs or symptoms of illness or infection). your irb has determined that assent of children age 8 and older is required for the study. a 10-year-old firmly declined to participate in the study described above. which of the following procedures best describes the action to be taken by the investigator? a. honor the child's decision b. consent both of the child's parents instead c. consent one of the child's parents instead d. request the child reconsider assenting to the study

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 18:40

The federal reserve collects information about which of the following? (select all that apply.)the national money supplycommercial banksother depository institutionsthe us office of the treasury

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Please help im broke and sleep oj]n the flloororr r
...

Questions