In regards to the Law of Supply, Price and Quantity Supplies have A direct relationship (if price goes up quantity supplied goes up too) An indirect relationship (if price goes up quantity supplied goes down) A varying relationship (if price goes up it depends on the specific situation to determine if quantity supplied goes up or down) No relationship because it is price and supply (shouldn't be quantity supplied)

Who can punish member in the house for disorderly behavior

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

Miniver cheevy's foolishness is clearly on display in the fifth quatrain. how so?