subject
Social Studies, 17.10.2020 22:01 molliemoo1002

ASAP PLZ HELP, I will mark BRAINLIEST Read This and answer 2 questions:
“Democrats are understandably furious and fearful over the likelihood that President Trump and the Republican-controlled Senate will replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a conservative. That does not justify packing the Supreme Court with progressives in retaliation…
...The United States has faced this dilemma before. The incredibly bitter election of 1800 featured Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson and incumbent President John Adams, a Federalist, who traded accusations that the other was undemocratic and would destroy the new nation. Federalists responded by expanding the number of judges with what derisively became known as the Midnight Judges Act. Adams also appointed a new United States chief justice, John Marshall, who was confirmed by the Federalist-controlled Senate only seven days after his nomination. Jefferson’s party later repealed the act packing the lower courts and terminated the judgeships, but did not seek to pack the Supreme Court to override the Federalist majority, even after Marshall authored the landmark Marbury v. Madison opinion establishing the judiciary’s power to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. The result was the establishment of the norm we have come to treasure: judicial independence even in the face of fierce partisanship.
That independence must be preserved — especially because the judiciary has assumed so much power since our nation’s founding. The court’s composition is politically controversial precisely because it has used the power Marshall established to decide politically contentious questions. Once courts become political footballs, new governments will expand courts to ensure that court rulings never go against their will. That would eviscerate the Bill of Rights, turning it from a protection against majority rule into a mere parchment proclamation….”
1) Within the context of the situation described in the excerpt above, explain how Judicial review is at work.
2) Explain how the scenario described in the excerpt above could affect the policy-making process.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 13:30
What does bernard believe about the effects of conditioning? does lenina agree with him?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:40
Which of the following was not a part of the armistice between germany and the allies? a. germany had to agree to the terms of the treaty of brest-litovsk. b. germany had to surrender its entire submarine fleet to the allies. c. kaiser wilhelm ii had to give his throne. d. all german troops had to be withdrawn from the western front.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:50
The provisions of subpart d, of the hhs regulations, additional protections for children involved as subjects in research apply to: all research involving childrenall research that is > minimal riskall research funded by any federal agencyall research funded by hhs
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:30
Lots of points: economics: a rise in price sends a signal to producers to supply. a. reduce b. increase c. maintain d. stop
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
ASAP PLZ HELP, I will mark BRAINLIEST Read This and answer 2 questions:
“Democrats are unders...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.05.2020 11:57
question
Mathematics, 19.05.2020 11:57
Questions on the website: 13722363