HURRY ITS TIMED I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST Why do some people consider the way the media cover candidates for public office bad for democracy?
(A).People tend to vote for the candidates who they find most appealing, rather than the ones whose beliefs are most like their own.
(B.)The media are for-profit businesses, unable to be fair or objective in the interest of the public
(C.)Candidates already in office receive more media attention than those who are trying to take their positions.
(D.)People always vote for the person the media determine is most qualified, rather than the candidate who can bring about change.

D) People always vote for the person the media determine is most qualified, rather than the candidate who can bring about change.

Explanation:

Because, because. Hope this helps you. Because. :)

there are conflicting perceptions. what cannot be denied is that despite a long history of discrimination, they finally chose to bow out in grace and handed over power to the majority. it was a painful experience for them to part with their prerogatives and some chose to leave the country. however, they did decide to bite the bullet and go through the process with minimum obstructions.

presently, whites are still a force to reckon with. they are well educated, have technical and business expertise, they understand imperatives of good governance and are responsible for keeping south africa connected with developed countries. despite a bitter history, they are useful team members of the south african team.

can you explain a little further maybe give multiple choice? ?