Jose is researching the civil rights movement of the 1960s to write a report on key leaders of the movement. He reads the transcript of an interview with Bayard Rustin, the man who organized the March on Washington where Martin Luther King Jr. gave his "I Have a Dream” speech. Use the drop-down menus to answer the questions. Is the interview transcript a primary or secondary source? Is the interview transcript a credible or not credible source for Jose’s purpose? What kind of information could Jose get from this source?

Primary

Credible

Information about the march on washington

Explanation:

i got it from the comments on the original post, and it was right :)

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals