One of the most important reasons to conduct cross-cultural research in psychopathology is that:.

Explanation:

To understand the importance of cross-cultural research in psychopathology, it is of the essence to have basic knowledge of mental health and in what way cross-cultural research effect or influences it.

Firstly, mental health is a state of well-being in which an individual situation AND sometimes individualmental health depends on their socio-cultural environement. The ablility of an individual to be total sound mental is based on both psychiatric and psychosomatic conditions as a result of where they are situated. In absence of normal mental development, a situation term psychopathology arises which is the study of mental disorders and unusual or maladaptive behaviours. In order to understand the reason for the daperity between the difference in mental health as a result ofcultural difference Cross-cultural studies is important so we can understand more about psychopathology on how culture impacts the experience of various disorders as a reult of their environment and cultural dispersiation .

Cross-cultural studies is basically a way, methods that are derivied, proposed, to finding, expanding our knowledge and used to generate understanding on the various and varying experiences manners, behaviors about the interactions of different cultural groups under a universal perspective in order to understand how culture influences experience behaviours, and other aspects in understanding humans developmental processes by looking at various cultural context.

european feudalism was a combination of legal and military customs in medieval europe that flourished between the 9th and 15th centuries. broadly defined, it was a way of structuring society around relationships derived from the holding of land in exchange for service or labour.

japanese feudalism. the era of feudalism in japan took place from the 12th through 19th centuries. during that period local rulers, either powerful families or military warlords, dominated the land, while the emperor was merely a figurehead and not a significant political presence.