A government of three branches with equal powers does not exist anywhere else. Humans are capable of creating a fair system using separate powers. Past governments have created separate powers on many occasions. It is likely that the government will function successfully by separating powers.

A government of three branches with equal powers does not exist anywhere else.

Explanation:

Complete question below

Anti-federalist response:

This hypothesis [separation of powers] supposes human wisdom competent [capable] to the task of instituting three co-equal orders in government. . . . Mr. Adams . . . has not been able to adduce [find] a single instance of such a government. . . . If such an organization of power were practicable [able to be used], how long would it continue? Not a day.

Which statement supports the author's main claim?

• A government of three branches with equal powers does not exist anywhere else.

• Humans are capable of creating a fair system using separate powers.

• Past governments have created separate powers on many occasions.

• It is likely that the government will function successfully by separating powers.

The statements which support the author's main claim is

A government of three branches with equal powers does not exist anywhere else.

This means the existence of government with three branches having equal power does not exist anywhere else.

The three branches of government includes

• Executive arm of government responsible for carrying out the laws of the land

• Legislative arm of the government responsible for making laws.

• Judiciary arm of the government responsible for upholding the laws of the land and punishing offenders.

the answer to your question is false can’t remember who he rode with but he rode with sombody

answer; people have no objective standard by which to judge themselves;