Schuman begins with a pretty big claim that is, of course, impossible to prove 100%. What does this tell you about who Schuman intends for her audience

Schuman intends to lubricate and distract his audience, so that they end up believing everything he says.

Explanation:

Arguments must be exposed in a direct, specific, simple, succinct and completely subject to proof. An argument that has these characteristics is formulated by a person who does not intend to deceive his audience, nor to force the public to, by convention, believe everything that has been said.

Schuman's argument has none of these characteristics and is issued to compromise the public's reasoning, distracting and forcing them to believe Schuman's information, without anyone being concerned with the veracity of the words.

try something like republic or democracy joined or something because its talking about a election party.

it would be d). more resources must be obtained to attain that combination of goods and services