GIVING 20 POINTS! . One of the biggest arguments against ratification of the Constitution was the lack of a Bill of Rights, protecting the freedoms many delegates felt they fought for in the Revolutionary War. Do you agree with this argument? Had you been a delegate at the Second Continental Congress, would you have fought for a Bill of Rights to be added before ratification? Why or Why not?

Your question has been heard loud and clear.

No , I would have fought for the bill of rights to be added after ratification because put simply , before ratification , you do not have a medium to pass the bill of rights , so logically fighting for bill of rights is only if the ratification does not include it , so when it does not include it , we fight for the bill of rights , I agree with this argument of lack of bill of rights as it is most certainly , fundamental to the constitution , and without it , freedom is a minor right which is often neglected. So definetly if bill of rights is not included in the constitution , ratification is not needed.

Thank you.

the question deals with financial planning and the answer is that dan did not stay on budget due to the fact that this guy needs to start decreasing his discretionary spending. according to the financial plan, he needed to balance his expenses and resources.