Daniel's work placed him in a group of 5 to demonstrate a new method of taking inventory of the store's products in less time. Two of Daniel's group members do not seem interested in contributing. Daniel begins to get frustrated that his goal of completing the task is blocked. Daniel remembers that is better than , especially when .

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

The decision states that legislation cannot overcome social prejudice. can it reinforce social prejudice? how?

Where do the majority of cases heard by the supreme court originate?