subject
Social Studies, 18.07.2020 02:01 mine9226

The defendant was on trial for driving while intoxicated and injuring a pedestrian. The pedestrian claimed that the defendant was driving the car; however, the defendant's spouse testified at trial that she had been driving the car at the time of the accident and had not consumed any alcohol that evening. In response, the prosecution calls a friend of the defendant's spouse to testify that the spouse told the friend that she and the defendant had changed seats in the car after the incident and that she remained in the driver's seat until the police arrived. Is the testimony admissible? A. Admissible for impeachment purposes only.
B. Admissible to show bias.
C. In-admissible, because a witness who is available to testify can be impeached only through cross-examination.
D. In-admissible, because the witness must be given an opportunity to explain or deny the statement.

.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00
2. when a government has total control over its citizens, including the media, it is a of government question 2 options: constitutional monarchy parliamentary democracy autocracy presidential democracy
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
Me asap worth brainlieist and 50 points
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:30
Me and i you plus a 5 stars and brainlist
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 14:00
Describe the different means of transport used in india
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The defendant was on trial for driving while intoxicated and injuring a pedestrian. The pedestrian c...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 29.05.2021 06:20
question
Mathematics, 29.05.2021 06:20
question
Mathematics, 29.05.2021 06:20
question
Mathematics, 29.05.2021 06:20
question
Mathematics, 29.05.2021 06:20
question
Chemistry, 29.05.2021 06:20
question
Mathematics, 29.05.2021 06:20
Questions on the website: 13722363