Given the following syllogism: No untalented bards are compelling writers, so some uncompelling writers are not uninspired poets, for some inspired poets are talented bards. After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 1A, the conclusion is: Group of answer choices

Given the following syllogism:

No untalented bards are compelling writers,

So some uncompelling writers are not uninspired poets.

For some inspired poets are talented bards

A) After reducing the number of terms in the syllogim, what is the conclusion?

B) Major premise?

C) Minor Premise?

A. All compelling writers are talented bards

B.  Some inspired poets are talented bards

C.  Some inspired poets are not compelling writers

Explanation:

Syllogism is a term in philosophy that describes logical conclusion, derived from deductive reasoning to obtain conclusion on the premises of two or more proposition, which is considered to be true.

Hence, in this case, the conclusion of this syllogism is that, All compelling writers are talented bards

While the major premise, which is supported by two premises is - Some inspired poets are talented bards

The minor premise is - Some inspired poets are not compelling writers

answer; /// the answer to the first question is (b) it began when people first deliberately seeds; /// and (d); // it gave people a steady food supple for the first time;

chavez's example shows that nonviolent protest can work well. it shows that one nonviolent man can stop a mob, which proves chavez's point and persuades people to protest nonviolently.