Which questions must be considered when evaluating the effectiveness of an argument? Select four options, Is there empirical evidence in the argument?
O Is there reliable evidence to support the reasons?
Are there logical reasons to believe the claim?
O is the author's claim clear to the reader?
O Does the author's diction affect the reader as intended?

The questions that must be considered when evaluating the effectiveness of an argument are:

An argument is the exchange of ideas between two or more people, using points to back up their respective claims about a particular thing.

When an argument is done logically, it makes use of a premise and a conclusion which makes the claim valid, factual and true.

With these in mind, when evaluating how effecive an argument is, it is  important to check:

Therefore, the correct answers are options B, C, D, and E

Read more here:

link

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.  

the density would be a smaller number.