Conclusions will usually be more objective if . a. consistent criteria are used in evaluating options b. the data are manipulated to support a predetermined outcome c. the researcher relies on personal experience related to the report problem d. you use strong language to sensationalize your findings

In every report, there is always a conclusion. Conclusions will usually be more objective, if consistent criteria are used in evaluating options.

The commonly read aspects of a report are generally the sections devoted to  conclusions and recommendations.

The conclusions of a report  is known to  analyze information logically and show how the data solve questions and solve problems.

Learn more from

link

a. consistent criteria are used in evaluating options

Explanation:

A consistent criteria used when evaluating options actually makes conclusions to be objective.

When options are evaluated, the premises/criteria that support that particular conclusion should be consistent. Therefore, the rationale behind a conclusion being objective is consistency.

well, i can't read it so i'll ask you questions about it : )

if you were a reader and you read the introduction, would you want to read more?

does it start with a question? if so, is it something you would want to read about?

and ask any friends or family for their opinion : )