subject
Social Studies, 24.06.2020 02:01 juliawatakip5fmg7

While conducting her within subjects design, Geraldine notices that participants are failing to fully complete the last level of the independent variable. Specifically, subjects are leaving questions blank and do not appear to be placing as much effort into the study as they were in the first level of the independent variable. Geraldine is seeing what disadvantage to using a within subjects design? coruse hero psyc 255

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:40
Which is relatively better: a score of 76 on a psychology test or a score of 22 on an economics test? scores on the psychology test have a mean of 90 and a standard deviation of 13. scores on the economics test have a mean of 52 and a standard deviation of 10.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:20
Instead of focusing solely on standardized testing, school districts should pay more attention to the learning habits of students and their ability to synthesize and apply knowledge.this is an example of which type of claim?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:00
Regardless of the breadth of the definition attached to the term law, there is an essential truth to the fact that at the core of the nation's expansive legal system lays a body of enforceable written rules meant to maintain order, define the outer limits of our interactions with one another and with our governments, and delineate legal rights and responsibilities. these rules derive from several sources, which collectively are called primary sources of law. there are also secondary sources of law, which are not laws in the technical sense for this assignment, identify and discuss the four types of primary sources of law. in your response, be sure to define each one. discuss what types of laws are derived from each source. identify the source of authority for each one. lastly, provide an example of a law from each source.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30
Donald was arrested for murdering an acquaintance. at the trial, donald takes the stand and testifies that he and the victim knew each other. he admits that they would drink and use drugs together. one night while partying, donald explains in his testimony, an argument got out of hand during a card game. donald explains that the victim accused him of cheating and pulled out a knife on him and started swinging it in the air. donald said that he had no choice but to pull out his gun and shoot the victim. the jury convicted donald of manslaughter. who would argue that donald weighed the potential costs and benefits of shooting the victim and decided to pull the trigger as a result of free will? a. a rational choice theorist b. a critical criminologist c. a conflict theorist d. a positivist
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
While conducting her within subjects design, Geraldine notices that participants are failing to full...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.03.2021 18:40
question
Computers and Technology, 03.03.2021 18:40
question
Mathematics, 03.03.2021 18:40
question
Mathematics, 03.03.2021 18:40
Questions on the website: 13722362