The anti-federalists’ main objection to ratifying the constitution was that a. had no bill of rights b. had no provision for a militia c. did not divide the central government d. did not have a judiciary

A. had no bill of rights

In the ratification debate of the constitution, the Anti-Federalists opposed to the Constitution because they complained that the new system threatened the liberties and it has failed to protect individual rights. They believed that each state should have the right to decide its own laws so the bill of rights must be induced too.

The Anti-Federalists main objection to ratifying the Constitution was that it had no bill of rights.

Further Explanation:

The Anti-Federalists were a political faction that developed during the Constitutional Convention. These individuals felt that state governments should have more power than the federal government. These individuals feared that a strong central (aka federal) government would lead to tyranny, much like it did when the Americans were under the control of Great Britain.

This is why the Anti-Federalists were in favor of a Bill of Rights. This group wanted a specific list of rights that citizens would possess. Their goal was to ensure that the federal government could not take away rights they considered essential. This includes rights like the freedom of speech, right to peacefully assemble, the right to a jury trial, etc.

Ultimately, the Anti-Federalists and their opponents (the Federalists) agreed to include the Bill of Rights within the new US Constitution.

Learn More:

Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists-

Key Details:

Topic: American History, Constitutional Convention

Grade Level: 7-12

Keywords: Anti-Federalists, Federalists, Constitutional Convention, Bill of Rights