Examine an argument made in public and translate its conclusion to show one of the four standard-form categorical propositions (A, E, I, or O). Does the conclusion follow from the premises? Why or why not? Second, if its premises are true, what else can you infer about the conclusion? Analyze.

See explaination

Explanation:

A contention made in open that the security of our nation is compromised by psychological oppression; so the National Security Agency can catch our telephone calls.

The straight out recommendation utilized here is; specific confirmed for example a few people are psychological militant.

The end pursues the reason that the security of the nation is under risk so the telephone calls can be captured.

Since the reason is genuine we can derive that we should monitor the security of our country.

answerviolation of expectancy paradigma;