Explain how the Peace of Augsburg, the Edict of Nantes, and the Peace of Westphalia all strengthened secular rulers. Help Now PLEASE!!

Explanation:

Peace of Augsburg was a treatie signed between Charles V, the Diet of the Holy Roman Empire in Augsburg and the Schmalkaldic Leaguer ending the conflict between Roman Catholics and Lutherans in Germany which leadm to religion tolerance and made it possible for rulers of the Holy Roman Empire to choose between Lutheranism Protestantism or Catholicism as the official religion of their state or as their choice of belief.This peace agreement was sign in 1555 in city of Augsburg

The Edict of Nantes was a law promulgated at Nantes in Brittany which put a temporary end to religious wars and conflict between Roman Catholics and French Protestants which was signed in April 1598 by King Henry IV of France which grant French Protestants actual rights in the nation as thiern counterpart in order to encourage and promote religion and civil unity in the nation.

Peace of Westphalia was a series of peace treaties signed between May and October 1648 which aim to put an end to the years llong wars among the European (Eighty Years'War among Spain and the Dutch and the German) which brought about the recognition of the full territorial sovereignty of the member states and religion tolerance.

Each of the above treaties or agreement help to promote and strength secular belief among various nations

answer; i believe the first answer to be (independent; /// and the second answer is (french); good luck

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.