Suppose Krissy orders some living room furniture from Bob. Krissy gives Bob a promissory note for the price of the furniture. But when Krissy receives the furniture, it is not the furniture she was promised. She refuses to pay on the note due to Bob's breach of contract. Both parties agree the contract was breached. However, Bob had already negotiated the note to a third party, Ron, who is an HDC. Will Krissy be allowed to use a "breach of contract" defense for not paying Ron the money on the note

i don't know the answer to this

2b2t

explanation:

2b2t

manifest functions are the recognized and intended consequences of any social pattern, while latent functions are those unrecognized and unintended consequences. to analyze the manifest functions of any social institution, we have to study its contribution to the continuation of a group, community, or society.

the answer is : the nut cases won't quit battling and their recurrence of flights will going to continue as before despite the fact that the battles are less hazardous now because of their bills have all of a sudden been blunted.   in the falcon dove diversion, two creatures will drive towards one another to crush one another, among the two one will win and other will swerve. in this way, clearly, the battle will be dependably there between two creatures for the assets or mate.