Social Studies, 21.04.2020 17:50 shanicar33500

Suppose that after Lucy signed the agreement, he decided he did not want the farm after all, and that Zehmer sued Lucy to perform the contract. Would this change in the facts alter the court’s decision that Lucy and Zehmer had created an enforceable contract? Why or why not? Miller, Roger LeRoy. Cengage Advantage Books: Business Law Today, The Essentials: Text and Summarized Cases (p. 215). Cengage Learning. Kindle Edition.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: mochoa4

ANSWER:

Since Lucy has signed the agreement with Zehmer, their have established an enforceable contract.

The court will have to see the agreement between the two parties as enforceable contract, which can only be terminated, if the two parties agrees. Therefore Lucy have to carry on the duties of the contract he has agreed on, by signature.

The court decision can only be reversed in favor of Lucy, if only Zehmer has deceived Lucy by making him sign the contract without proper information about the contract. Or if Zehmer has failed to perform his own obligation in the contract agreement.

Answer from: Quest

first of all, it's important to say that the book we shall not be moved, written by joan dash, is about the first strike of women in the united states in the year 1909. the best historical detail to clarify the reader's undertanding is the phrase "general strike". this strike involved women working at a garment factory who decided to protest long working hours, low wages and brutal conditions. this strike became known as "the new york shirtwaist strike" or "the uprising of the 20,000". the strike mostly involved jewish women who did not speak english or who had a basic knowledge of the english language. finally, the strike went on from november 1909 until february 1910.

Answer from: Quest

question 1

the reasons for the global discontent in the early 1900s were the following:

desire for independence was the main fight of many territories which were still under the control of colonial powers. dissatisfaction with peace terms of wwi . the best example is the case of germany, that was forced by the peace treaties to pay very expensive war reparations to the winners of wwi. some time later, german leaders broke relations and stopped recognizing the authority of those who imposed sanctions on their country, counting with the support of the population that was suffering the important economic consequences of the payment of reparations. overproduction of consumer goods which led to hyperinflation scenarios and very week currencies and economies.

question 2

the reasons for the great depression were the following, and these led to wall street crash in october 1929 and caused the subsequent great recession period.

high personal debt, that ended up with many bankrupt investors. falling stock price as everybody was getting rid of the stocks, many because they could not meet the amounts of money required by the margins that backed their investments.

question 3

italy: led by the fascists and benito mussolini and promised to restore the greatness of the roman empire. germany: led by adolph hitler and the nazi party and conducted anti-jewish riots in austriajapan: was controlled by aggressive military leaders and invaded countries for their resources

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:50

An experimenter is examining the relationship between age and self-disclosure. a large sample of participants that are 25 to 35 years old and participants that are 65 to 75 years old are compared, and significant differences are found with younger participants disclosing much more than older people. the researcher reports an effect size of .34. what does this mean

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:50

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30

Hegyes was driving her car when it was negligently struck by a unjian enterprises truck. she was injured, and an implant was placed in her body to counteract the injuries. she sued unjian, and the case was settled. two years later hegyes became pregnant. the growing fetus pressed against the implant, making it necessary for her doctor to deliver the child 51 days prematurely by cesarean section. because of its premature birth, the child had a breathing handicap. suit was brought against unjian enterprises for the harm sustained by the child. was the defendant liable?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:00

Miniver cheevy's foolishness is clearly on display in the fifth quatrain. how so?

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Suppose that after Lucy signed the agreement, he decided he did not want the farm after all, and tha...

Questions