Social Studies, 21.04.2020 16:57 amf14

First: Analyze and evaluate Descartes’ two proofs of God's existence. How are they different? Is one more convincing than the other? And secondly: How does Descartes explain how we humans make mistakes (errors)? Do not just state that a perfect creator made imperfect humans, this is NOT his answer. Descartes has several ideas on why we make mistakes and how we go wrong. Are Descartes' arguments convincing to you? Why or why not?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: kinslou6506

Check Explanation

Explanation:

Rene Descartes, a French philosopher, mathematician, and scientist, provided two great proof of God's existence which is known as "Two Proof of God’s Existence"

The first proof was that everything and beings In this world was created, and that a living or non living thing can't not be created on there own.

The second proof is that there is a power that is presserving human and no human being possess such powers except a divine being

The DIFFERENCE between the two proof stated above is that one stated that humans don't have powers on there own for preservation while the first stated that humans can not be created on there own. He made futher clarification that every object is created by someone. So, humans have Creator. The first proof talks about how Humans can not be created on it own which mean God is supreme and he his perfect while the second proof is that there Is a POWER behind human creation,means that in studying humans philosophy Which concerned Humans Attribute, such powers can't be control by humans Both proofs look alike but are different in meaning.

Both proof supports each other. The first proof, talking about human having a Creator directly talks about God powers and if the second proof supports it by looking at human philosophy, that is; if any humans study his or her attribute, the truth will be seen that humans being don't possess the powers to be created on it own.

Humans beings Made ERRORS according to Descartes, he said that the idea of perfectness was necessary because humans must exist has imperfect beings and only by that can humans knows that God is the Creator. If humans can only knows that there is creator behind them,if they made mistakes as imperfect beings. So, that the idea of perfectness will always be on humans mind

Furthermore, he said finite intellect is the source of human errors, many humans taught that they can achieve things without the creator,so they made ERRORS

DESCARTES argument are convincing Enough. The reason is that DESCARTES also proof this using the philosophy of humanity Which concerned human attribute. In human philosophy, powers

that preserve can't be possess by Humans and he also made use of "nothing comes from nothing" .In the philosophy of humans, it supports this as well.

Answer from: Quest

is this an essay or multiple choice

Answer from: Quest

the most likely outcome of fewer loon territories is that hawks would increase in proportion because the benefit of victory would be greater. hawks and loons are natural rivals of resources and victories in the game, since the lakes drying up affected the loons, the hawks would be benefited from the drought.

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:00

Which of the following is one of the innovations that neolithic farmers become more productive? a) plow b) windmill c) tractor d) reaper

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 21:00

"would you like to hear mademoiselle reisz play? " asked robert, coming out on the porch where she was. of course edna would like to hear mademoiselle reisz play; but she feared it would be useless to entreat her. "i'll ask her," he said. "i'll tell her that you want to hear her. she likes you. she will come." he turned and hurried away to one of the far cottages, where mademoiselle reisz

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 22:00

Traditionally, in order to be jewish, a person must have a jewish mother, follow the jewish religion, and abide by kosher food limitations. although they are not ironclad, these customs set "traditional" jewish people apart from others. what concept does this serve to illustrate?

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

First: Analyze and evaluate Descartes’ two proofs of God's existence. How are they different? Is one...

Questions