How do local party organizations differ from national committees?
a) only the national committee raises money
b) primaries happen on the local level once a year whereas they happen on the national level every four years
c) county chairmen have patronage power which they use to sway power both locally and nationally
d) national committee chairmen determine who is elected for precinct chairs

I think the best answer choice would be b). tbh im not so sure but it's the one that makes most sense. I'll try to explain. A is wrong because every committee needs to raise and have money not just national committees. C is wrong because that's why people vote. And d, well people also vote for that i think

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )