A police officer stops a car for speeding and conducts an illegal search of the trunk without a warrant or consent from the owner or operator. During the search, the officer however, finds a three kilos of cocaine, $35,000 in cash, and several stolen guns. Based on the exclusionary rule, what are the courts likely to do with the evidence in this case

The courts will likely exclude the evidence from court.

Explanation:

Exclusionary rule can be defined as rule which are legal, in which evidence collected without the warrant and consent from the owner can't be used against the owner in a court of law which is why police officers are been warned from abusing the constitutional rights because the rule are based on constitutional law which has to be adhere to .

Therefore the courts will likely exclude the evidence from court because the police officer conducts an illegal search of the trunk without a warrant or consent from the owner or operator.

this statement is true.

forests are public goods, available for everybody. when usage of such a good becomes interesting for consumers and its usage increases, there can be a risk of overexploitation. it is a non rival good therefore, if one person consumes the good it does not reduce the availability for subsequent consumers.

these caracteristics require the establishment of measures in order to prevent the destruction of a commonly owned space, for example, to restrict the amount of people that have access to the same time.