Recall the obedience experiment of Dr. Stanley Milgram. Given the ethical standards that now exist and are enforced by institutional review boards, the study is unlikely to be replicated today, exactly as Dr. Milgram conducted it. Which ethical standards did the original study appear to violate, if any? How might such a study be modified to avoid ethical problems and protect the participants from both physical and psychological harm?

Obedience was a very famous study or experiment that was conducted by Milligram Stanley in social psychology. He was a psychologist at Yale University.

He experiments on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He wanted to study investigate whether the Germans are more obedient to the authority figures.

It was the common explanation for the killed Nazi in world war 1. There were two participants teacher and learner. The learner was the confederate which is called Mr. Wallace.

In an experiment, he has taken into a room and attached electrodes attached to the arm and give electric current about 15 volts to 375 volts. The result was shown that ordinary people more obedient to the authority figure.

answer: ‘no one should be discriminated against because he or she is not from a minority group’

because—> affirmative action means ‘a policy or program that provides opportunities for traditionally disadvantaged groups to them overcome the effects of discrimination’

taking a bath requires the most water out of the given options because it takes a significant amount of water in order to fill a bathtub.