Determine which inductive argument form is employed in each argument shown next?

causal inference, argument based on signs, argument from authority, generalization, argument from analogy and prediction.

Argument A

After the fire was put out by the fire department, charred insulation was discovered on the wires inside the walls of one of the badly burned rooms. It can be concluded from this that the fire resulted from a problem with the house's electrical wiring.

Argument B

A local food critic has stated many times that Cafe La Bouffe is the best French restaurant in the Tri-State area. You can conclude from this that there is no better French restaurant in the Tri-State area than Cafe La Bouffe.

Argument C

During a talk on the history of presidential inaugurations, a presidential historian mentioned that George Washington was first inaugurated in New York City. Based on this, it is likely that Washington did indeed take the presidential oath of office in New York.

Argument D

Dell and Gateway are similar because they are both major manufacturers of notebook computers. Since Dell makes a notebook computer with a built-in camera, it follows that Gateway probably also makes a notebook computer with a built-in camera.

Identify three different reasons of why people have had to migrate and give examples to justify your reasons. use 3-6 sentences to explain your response.

Which theoretical perspective would lead you to consider the broader social effects of the division of labor between men and women in the household? symbolic interactionism queer theory conflict theory structural functionalism

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?