Held says that every raw emotion is equally valid in thinking about morality.
True or False?

Held does not say that every raw emotion is equally valid in thinking about morality. False.

Explanation:

Held's argument about the use of moral standing and the use of raw emotion to determine what is moral and what is not moral is not entirely to be discounted.

This means that there is some truth to the factoring in of the work of the raw emotions of a person in determining what is for the good and what is not.

this is not however to say that it is always to be considered.

More often than not human emotions create an imbalance in critical and useful thinking and cannot be relied upon always.

answer; by working independently, the states have a high likelihood of developing innovative solutions that can be employed in other states;

you probably know the answer. stop asking stupid questions and making me waste my time. j.k. ; )   b.t.w. what are three ratios equivalent to 5 : 11? thx