subject
Social Studies, 31.03.2020 19:35 MCMarioandLuigi

If warmly supportive parents are especially likely to have children with high self-esteem, this would most clearly indicate that

a. warmly supportive parenting and children's self-esteem are correlated.
b. the temperament of high self-esteem is biologically predisposed.
c. authoritative parenting is more effective than authoritarian parenting.
d. permissive parenting is more effective than authoritative parenting.
e. children's self-esteem stimulates warmly supportive parenting.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:10
Where did the constitutional convention take place
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
For 50 pointsfredrika's science teacher asked her to bring in three abiotic items from her backyard ecosystem. which of the following groups of items should she bring? a. a lightning bug, a plug of grass, and a wormb. a smooth rock, some red dirt, and an empty bird's nestc. a ladybug, a spider, and some water from a mud puddled. a caterpillar, a pine cone, and a piece of a robin's egg
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30
What does it signify if point 1 shifts down and to the right? a. the price level and the real gdp are falling. b. the real gdp is falling, and supply is increasing. c. the price level is rising, and production is increasing. d. the price level is falling, and demand and the real gdp are rising.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
If warmly supportive parents are especially likely to have children with high self-esteem, this woul...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 04.10.2019 23:00
question
Mathematics, 04.10.2019 23:00
Questions on the website: 13722363