More recent approaches in historical anthropology, while sharing an interest in power with world-system theorists, have focused more on Group of answer choices the role of colonial bureaucracies in shaping international culture. the structural causes of colonialism. local agency, the transformative actions of individuals and groups within colonized societies. the state's role in denying some of its citizens a place in history. how anthropological theory can aid NGOs in writing an alternate history of oppressed peoples.

Local agency, the transformative actions of individuals and groups within colonized societies.

Explanation:

In the past, most approaches in historical anthropology focused on the troubling dynamics of colonial powers and colonized peoples. The power structure was considered to be essential to the understanding of cultural development. While this approach still exists, more recent approaches in historical anthropology want to help the colonized people regain a voice. Because of this, they often focus on local agency and on the transformative actions of individuals and groups within these communities.

answer: musical connotation

leonard b. meyer (1918-2007) was an american composer, author and philosopher. his work emotion and meaning in music is perhaps the first major treatise on music. it is a philosophical and psychological work, greatly influenced by koffka (one of the major proponents of gestalt psychology). his work deals with the problem of musical meaning and musical communication.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.