In a movie, the character Meili was born in Asia and is a non-Christian in a
predominantly Chr...
Social Studies, 25.03.2020 19:57 amoryfe28p0vpwo
In a movie, the character Meili was born in Asia and is a non-Christian in a
predominantly Christian town. The character Ankti, whose mother is an
American Indian, behaves according to high moral principles, and her
teachers say that others should behave as she does. Another character,
Javier, is a helpless older Latino. In this movie, Javier's role is that of a(n) .
A. Consumer
B. Infantilized person
C. Heathen
D. Model minority
Answers: 3
Another question on Social Studies
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:20
As our current atmosphere formed, the concentrations of various atmospheric gases fluctuated. match each gas with the explanation that best describes how its proportion changed during the evolution of the atmosphere.
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:10
In griswold v. connecticut, on what did justice goldberg base his concurring opinion? the protection granted by the constitution the intention of the writers of the constitution the list of rights in the first eight amendments the human rights safe from government intervention
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10
Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00
Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Questions
Mathematics, 30.03.2021 02:10
Mathematics, 30.03.2021 02:10
History, 30.03.2021 02:10
Mathematics, 30.03.2021 02:10
Mathematics, 30.03.2021 02:10
Mathematics, 30.03.2021 02:10
Mathematics, 30.03.2021 02:10
History, 30.03.2021 02:10
Chemistry, 30.03.2021 02:10
Chemistry, 30.03.2021 02:10
Medicine, 30.03.2021 02:10
