You should present a cogent argument based on your critical analysis of the questions posed, using appropriate psychological terminology. It is not enough to answer a question by merely listing facts. Lisa, who is visiting a large city for the first time, is waiting alone to cross the street at a crowded intersection. The weather is very sunny and the heat is making her feel dizzy. Eventually, she is overcome by dizziness and collapses to the ground. For Part A, explain how each of the following concepts would hinder Lisa from getting help for her situation. Fundamental attribution error Prejudice Just-world hypothesis Bystander effect For Part B, explain how each of the following concepts would help Lisa in getting help for her situation. Conformity Social norms Altruism

Rick is a toddler with an easy temperament and active nature. people are often seen stopping to talk to him in supermarkets and parks where his mother takes him in the evenings because he smiles willingly at other children and adults. this aspect of rick’s behavior most likely reflects a(n) active genotype–environment interaction suppressive genotype-environment interaction passive genotype–environment interaction evocative genotype–environment interaction

Describe some effects of the rise of communism in the soviet union?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.