Match the terms with the correct definitions. 1) Personal property a) A thing that once was personal property but has become real property 2) Real property b) Anything with an ascertainable value that is subject to ownership 3)Fixture Land and everything attached to it c) Property Property that is movable, not attached to land.

1. Personal property is that which is movable and not attached to land.

2. Real property refers to anything with an assertainable value that is subject to ownership.

3. Fixture land and everything attached to it implies anything that once was personal property but has now become real property.

Explanation:

Personal property also called chattel or movable property simply refers to properties that are movable. It includes possession of any type as long as they are owned by somebody.

Real property refers to possessions that are permanently fixed in a location. It most times includes land and anything that is built on the land.

Fixture land and everything attached majorly deals with buildings and other improvements that are attached to real property in such a way that the fixture cannot be removed without causing substantial damage to the real property, or the fixture is so adapted to and takes on the characteristics of the real property that it becomes part of that real property.

what are the choices? the multiple choices?

i will answer in the comments after the choices have been said.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.