While riding up a ski lift, you see a skier falling down the mountain. You decide that the skier must not have been very skilled and should have been on an easier slope. Your friend, however, thinks the skier fell because conditions on the mountain were dangerous. You are making a attribution and your friend is making a attribution.

The answer is dispositional and situational, respectively.

Explanation:

A dispositional attribution judgement holds a person's internal traits as responsible for an outcome. In the example, you think the skier fell due to his lack of skills.

On the other hand, a situational attribution holds the conditions of the environment or the situation as responsible for the outcome.

Studies show that situational attribution is more common when judging our own outcomes, especially when negative.

- "ethical issues. deception – the participants actually believed they were shocking a real person and were unaware the learner was a confederate of milgram's. however, milgram argued that “illusion is used when necessary in order to set the stage for the revelation of certain difficult-to-get-at-truths.” "

- "milgram's work was conducted in the early 1960s before the current.the studies ignited a debate about the ethical treatment of participants. what appear to be dangerous, if not deadly, electric shocks and the by today's ethical standards, many questions about the research have gone unanswered."

answer; membership group;